By Helen Ang
_________________________
A commentator Gua Bay Song posits — among other strong comments including one by SV Singam on ‘shooting barking dogs’, in a People’s Parliament post — that “the shitty MSM material is usually found between page 1 to page 10.” http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/dear-advertiser-are-we-to-believe-what-the-lying-newspapers-say-about-you-and-your-products/
I’m suggesting that political and corporate considerations do colour other sections of a newspaper besides domestic news, though to what extent is difficult to measure unless you are in know about what goes on in the MSM backrooms.
On example of is the dearth of bad press in The Star, and I daresay the rest of local mainstream media for The Touch, a movie was that star vehicle for Michelle Yeoh. It marked Michelle’s debut as co-producer through her own production company Mythical Films.
The Touch (2002) is a Malaysia-released Hong Kong film with most of the dialogue in English.
One reviewer had said of it: “Michelle Yeoh and [director] Peter Pau have clearly set out to make a Hollywood film. Unfortunately, they have succeeded.” Another reviewer said: “It plays more like Lara Croft’s slightly befuddled Asian sister, gone astray in the Gobi desert and a bit confused about which way to go.”
In the Internet Movie Database, it was said to be “utterly forgettable and disappointing”. Although some moviegoers did have good words for it, The Touch “seemed to be universally acclaimed a major disappointment”.
Its major fault in the critics’ eye was the weak story. One critic wrote: “The landscapes of Tibet are impressive and make the movie more memorable than the thin plot deserves.” The Touch however did win awards in cinematography for Pau’s work, who was Director of Photography for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, in which Michelle also starred.
Other critics did not like The Touch’s “flaming arrows shooting all over the place”, and said it was “a limp showcase of terrible CGI. Bad call to go the special effects route, Michelle!”
As far as I can ascertain, the movie was not reviewed in The Star then in 2002. Strange?
There was publicity write-up in The Star though on The Touch, most naturally, as the Bond Girl is Malaysia’s media darling. She has been guest-of-honour at the newspaper’s media events and been pictured with the paper’s big bosses.
As far as I’m aware, again, whatever write-up there was in The Star was not negative, bucking the trend of what’s been reported of the movie in the rest of the world, going by reports found on the Net.
And here’s another funny thing. The site with the most comprehensive collection of movie reviews is Rotten Tomatoes. Although it’s mostly about Hollywood films, I did manage to access very favourable reviews of Crouching Tiger and Jet Li’s Hero.
I did a search in Rotten Tomatoes on The Touch and found several movies with similar titles. The first one on the list was Touch of Evil, a 1958 effort starring Charlton Heston and Janet Leigh. Michelle’s movie was listed as The Touch (2004).
When I clicked on Touch of Evil, the page opened fine. But when I clicked on Michelle’s movie, I got the message ‘Internet Explorer has encountered a problem and needs to close’. This happened a few times. I tried several alternative ways to access the page, including via ‘cached’ and Google Search, and every time, I encountered a bug which shut down my Net.
I use Streamyx broadband. Can you guys reading this please go to the Rotten Tomatoes site, check it out and tell me if you encounter the same perplexing problem. And can some techie conjecture as to why this technical glitch?





March 29, 2008 at 5:36 pm
No problems opening in Firefox
Haris, how do I attach a screenshot?
SV,
Read my rejoinder to Raj.
I am a dinosaur playing in technopark.
Please do not embarass me with difficult questions.
March 29, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Using Opera, this page loads fine: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10001039-touch/?page=1&critic=&sortby=&name_order=desc&view=text#mo. Seems to be a mediocre and relatively unknown film
March 29, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Go here:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10001039-touch/
No problems accessing “my touch”
Try using a real computer.. like a Mac no problems you described.
March 29, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Ark,
Thanks, I clicked on your link, got the page, clicked on something there and got this when my cursor moves:
Runtime Error! Program C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\jexplore.exe
R6025 — pure virtual function call.
Sounds like English, but makes no sense to me …
March 29, 2008 at 6:45 pm
Aiyo! What kind of logic is this?
Just because Dato Michelle is chummy with WWC doesn’t mean that WWC’s movie reviewers are chummy with Dato Michelle.
“I tell you ah! You write something nice about Pak Lah’s best friend’s movie or you will end up with classifieds for the rest of your life!”
C’mon lah! Give us a break! You are slapping every MSM staff with this kind of diatribe lah.
Helen: For a person of your intellect, you do go a bit too far to defend Haris.
[Gua Bay Song watches the watchmen]
March 29, 2008 at 7:06 pm
Gua … well, Hullo.
Just trust me on this one.
Read again. I did not say that the movie reviewer wrote nice things. I said that I did not come across any movie review of ‘The Touch’ in The Star, at all.
Normally, yes, The Star’s regular reviewers (you’re correct — not likely friends of Michelle, and in fact & actually friends of mine lah!) would regularly review movies, duh.
So how come no review — as far as I know of — was printed (question mark, or should it be hint, hint).
Or it may have been published and I could have missed it. Something the public can verify.
March 29, 2008 at 7:34 pm
pls check…
Michelle Yeoh is NOT a Malaysian.
She has given up her citizenship years ago when she married a hongky.
Enuff putting her on pedestal. She doesnt even care abt Malaysia. c’mon la. she has given up the citizenship merely for marriage
March 29, 2008 at 8:33 pm
I love Michelle Yeoh. And I’m younger than Jean Todt.
Michelle, my belle
………….
Farida,
Do you have the lyrics?
March 29, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Page loaded fine:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10001039-touch/
Just wondering if this is being brought up to prove that the MSM only likes portraying Malaysians (especially those chummy with the administration) in rose-tinted glasses.
I believe there’s bigger fish to fry than Michelle Yeoh, right?
Or am I missing the point here?
March 29, 2008 at 10:17 pm
i always wonder,why our goverment or msn will immediately claim a sucessfull people formely from malaysia as malaysian.(WHEN THIS PERSON NO LONGER MALAYSIAN CITIZEN) By saying they make malaysia proud regardless race when this people can be chinese or indian.example michele yeoh,guy bastion ( the singer from australia ) and someone from sabah became mp in australia.sorry i read to much but sometimes my memory like senile people.forgot.BUT WHEN IN MALAYSIA IF OTHER RACE THAN THE MALAY OUTSHINE THEY STILL TAG WITH INDIAN,CHINESE,KADAZAN ext.international level we malaysian,locally we are racist.thanks.raj raman.race.still dreaming 2b malaysian putra,religion;i will anwser to god for all the mess he did by creating so many race,color and religion when time due 4me.MEANWHILE I WILL WAIT TO MEET THE GOD.ooops sorry god.
March 29, 2008 at 10:35 pm
don’t like the movie, quite shitty.
March 29, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Hmmm, Firefox OK, Opera OK, Mac browser (what?) OK…
…seems like the deficiencies of Internet Explorer are finally showing.
This is a reversal. Usually websites are developed with IE as the reference and some of these websites don’t function properly with other browsers.
It looks like Rotten Tomatoes was built using common browser standards that Microsoft likes to ignore. If more web developers do that, the M$ hegemony can be eroded.
Nice one.
March 29, 2008 at 11:14 pm
HARIS,DONT MODERATE MY COMMENT TO LONG.I AM OBSSESS OF TIME.WANT TO BE THE FEW FIRST TO BLOG TO YOU.TRY TO BE FAME.TRYING MY LUCK.MAYBE NEXT ELECTION I CAN BECOME YB/MP IN THIS LALANG AND GRASSHOPPER COUNTRY.BRAIN DEAD AND BRAIN DRAIN COUNTRY BUT WILL CLAIM MALAYSIAN ONCE YOU BECOME FAMOUS IN OTHER PEOPLE COUNTRY.TAKEN MY VALIUM.GOOD NIGHT HARIS.raj raman
March 30, 2008 at 12:18 am
Oh, come on Ms Ang, you’re reading too much into this. This is getting petty.
March 30, 2008 at 7:58 am
[...] Bond Girl Michelle Yeoh was Malaysia’s media darling who could do no wrong [image] [image] [...]
March 30, 2008 at 10:05 am
Indeed. Petty. I agree.
And being too suspicious about everything and anything else which does/do not conform to one own’s agenda. That’s bad.
March 30, 2008 at 10:29 am
Anon28 at 12.18am,
Agree that I read too much into my own faulty PC configuration (and Shankar, agree that Mac rocks, pity I don’t got one at home). I tried Firefox as suggested and to my relief, the page indeed loaded, unlike with IE which was indeed getting to be a petty annoyance — having the Net crash repeatedly.
I’m also chuffed to see that I have such a strong readership including my loyal fan SV Singam; Rotten Tomatoes is a Top Click now on PP, so thanks guys for experimenting — Haris & I need to attend a tech workshop.
About reading too much into it, Anon 28, I think you miss the point. There was no Star movie review as such to read!! I asked a friend to search The Star’s electronic archives. No review (as distinct from publicity write-up) could be located.
The negative reviews I quoted in my post were not local. They were foreign Net material.
I do not remember any review appearing in The Star’s print copy back in 2002 either. And if you ask me how come I can recall, the answer is I worked there, okay?
As I confessed to Gua Bay Song, The Star movie reviewers circa 2002 were my friends. Truth be told, of course they would not say a movie was good if it was bad. They would say outright the movie sucked. And I do believe one of them may have said something to that effect.
Consider these premises as to what ultimately sees print and what doesn’t.
1. The reporters do their job, write the truth and the bosses don’t approve their work to see print, for political or corporate reasons.
2. cf. Gua Bay Song: Generally yes, the editors do not hold a gun to a reporter’s head and command “You write this (something untrue).”
But there’s also the implicit understanding that you don’t badmouth what’s relevant to your rice bowl, and outside of domestic-political news, there is also project-writing, e.g. publicity material for KL Fashion Week and all the other media-community-entertainment events organized by MSM. Positive or negative write-up, you tell me.
3. If need be, the editors may slant a story by cutting it short, taking out bits or do some ‘rejigging’ (shift the paragraphs, adjust the copy flow), ‘re-angling’ (changing the focus), or give a misleading or disproportionate headline (something Kit Siang complained about recently of The Star).
4. Reporters self-censor, or toe the line knowing the corporate culture or if they want to move up fast along the career ladder, they promote the ‘party’ line & write their stories accordingly … this more visible in opinion than straight news writing.
I hope this explanation is satisfactory to you, Anon28 (first-time visitor and whoever you really are …).
March 30, 2008 at 11:05 am
Raj Raman,
Do you use ALL CAPITALS as a preference or are you using a terminal that, for some reason, only allows CAPITALS?
For one thing, it is rather hard to read all capitals.
For another, netiquette (etiquette on the Internet) considers ALL CAPITALS to be the equivalent of SHOUTING. As you read what I have written here, you may see what I mean.
But finally, it’s your choice.
On another note, the following is pure rumour… but here goes: when Dr M was told of the 2 Malaysians who had reached the peak of Mt Everest, he wanted to know specifically who had made it. When given the names, he asked, “Kita punya orang takda ka?”. Then he lost all interest in the expedition.
So much for Malaysian achievement.
March 30, 2008 at 11:14 am
Bond Girl or not. I cannot see wat is the hype is abt her and her movies.
Is Malaysia so devoid of heros and its ppl so brain dead that they need this to prep their lives?
March 30, 2008 at 11:43 am
thank
March 30, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Helen, you wrote:
===================================================
Truth be told, of course they would not say a movie was good if it was bad. They would say outright the movie sucked. And I do believe one of them may have said something to that effect.”
==================================================
On the other hand, the editor would had asked the writer to rewrite a good review, irregardless. After all, if there is this so called “good rapport between Star and M Yeoh”, surely a good write up would had been good promotion for her what. Rice bowl, you said right?
Sorry, you really need to prove what you wrote. Otherwise, it is just a conspiracy theory to me.
And by the way, what am I supposed to make out for the restaurants reviews, a section I like to read (since I like to eat out)? Or the tech section? They are owned by BN? Come on…..
March 30, 2008 at 5:06 pm
slinting eyes ‘Ah Soh’ is no beauty…………..
March 30, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Ooooph…*slanting….hahaha there I go again.TOO OLD , to be next heroine !!!
March 30, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Fenway,
This Bond Girl is a very particular case example I’ve cited and I’m citing this one which happened 6 years ago only because I have first-hand knowledge.
The Star set-up in 2002: (1) Full movie reviews appeared on Saturdays (‘Weekend’ the desk I was attached to as copyeditor).
(2) Capsuled (brief outtakes) movie reviews appeared in Star Two on certain weekdays.
(3) Publicity write-up which can appear as cover stories or in the Entertainment pages any day of the week, e.g. interviews, movie premiere in Los Angeles, visiting the stars on location, promos, contest giveaways, etc.
Note that (1) differs from (2) and (3), and I’m alluding strictly to (1), which is about the movie as it is to be run in the theatre.
(3) which like you say, “would had been good promotion for her what” was not the job done by the same bunch of writers who do (1) in Star, circa 2002.
You allege: “On the other hand, the editor would had asked the writer to rewrite a good review, irregardless.”
Again, I shall have to reiterate that in my posting above, I’m talking about people I know.
I will vouch for those who contributed in-house movie reviews to The Star c.2002 – SBT, DA, AA & HA (not Helen Ang) – that they write honestly about the movies as they see them. And I will further vouch that the individual – arguably M’sia’s best movie reviewer in English – who was in charge of clearing copy (movie reviews), would not have done anything like asked the writer to do a favourable rewrite as that’s unethical.
On the other hand, the contributing reviewers do not owe The Star their living as they’re not journos (c.f. your ‘rice bowl’ allusion). And pragmatically speaking, a top brass like WCW or the Managing Director ST (who rub shoulders with celebrities) would not really have any direct dealings with the movie reviewers who are ’stringers’.
So when I say that the Entertainment section can be coloured by corporate considerations, let’s just leave it at ultimately, whether something is published or not, can be decided at a level above the section heads.
For a current example of stories not seeing print, here’s one personalised conjecture. A reporter from theSun attended our ‘Boycott the Newspapers!’ press conference. We did not see her report published the next day or in subsequent days. So assuming that she conscientiously did her job and submitted a write-up about our PC, we can only assume that the editor decided not to run it for whatever reasons (in this instance).
For testimonies about how/why stories do not see the light of day, read here: http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/8467)
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/8497)
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/8498)
Recently, the Bangsa Malaysia Penang chapter and representatives from Mafrel met up with Star Penang and have filed a report. I hope those involved in preparing that report will put up their findings here in People’s Parliament as to how stories come to be buried.
Lastly about the veracity of restaurant reviews, I’m not divulging. Fenway, you tell me, since you’re the one doing all that eating.
March 30, 2008 at 9:36 pm
I’m wondering what this brouhaha is about. All that Helen suggested is that political and corporate considerations do colour other sections of a newspaper besides domestic news, though to what extent is difficult to measure unless a person is in the know about what goes on in the MSM backrooms.
To give one example of the dearth of bad press in local MSM in those other sections, she mentioned that as far as she could ascertain, Michelle Yeoh’s The Touch was not reviewed in The Star.
She found that strange and so do I, particularly as the paper had provided a publicity write-up. It would have been natural to follow up with a review.
Like Helen, I too was once part of the MSM. I had first-hand experience of what it was like to have bosses who pandered to their political masters.
I was once told by my boss to get one of my feature writers to write a story on a Minister’s wife – only to find out in due course that the Minister’s wife herself had requested for the article to be done on her!
I ran an amusing letter by a reader commenting on the tardy shapes of jewellery pieces crafted by a famous international jeweller. I was hauled up by the editor because that jeweller was the paper’s biggest advertiser and in retaliation, the jeweller had pulled back the forthcoming ads.
One excellent journalist wrote a well-researched, explosive article about the sorry state of Tamil schools and her scumbag colleague who only wrote PR pieces for the Ministry of Education tipped off someone in the Ministry. The result? One phonecall to the editor and the article was spiked.
And folks, if you are one of those who must check their atsrological sign’s Word for the Day, forget it.
While on duty one evening checking each page before the paper went to print, I alerted the pasteup man that one of the astrological signs had an empty space and no text.
“No problem,” he said. He went into the backroom, took an old paper, cut out a text under I don’t know which astrological sign and stuck it onto the empty space.
Job done.
Do any of you need further proof that political and corporate considerations do colour other sections of a newspaper – other than what Helen and I have already provided?
March 30, 2008 at 9:43 pm
sorry,mr.Sv Singam,i have a habid of writig everything in capital letters.Its unbelieveble for me from malay medium school ( the first batch ).So i am catching up with my poor english by trying to be smart by using capital.You might not believe my tender or quotation is using capital those days.Now dont bother to tender for project.However whenever possible and if i can change my stuck up attitude i will try not to use capitals.BUT I NOT SHOUTING.IF YOU FEEL SO,I WILL ASK FOR YOUR FORGIVENESS.C OLD HABIT START AGAIN.Capital words again.However if i read any complain about me,i sure reply.Unless i dont read others comment about me.I have attitude problem being stuck up and suddenly stop communicating with anyone.STRESS MAN.Thanks.Mr.Sv.May we be friends.Send my applogy to all the bloggers please before they ban me.STUCK UP,but good guy.no harm done as far as know to any one other than god.
March 30, 2008 at 9:44 pm
Birdseye,
Can’t quite get the entire tune in my head-lah.Three lines will have to do:
Michelle, my belle,
Who’s that man with his hand on your shoulder, luv?
Didn’t Jean Todt get mad?
March 30, 2008 at 10:21 pm
Mr.Sv,point noted regarding the mamak mahathir.You see he is trying to show off he is more malay then the pure bred malay.Thats why he is more racist then the pure bred malay.Hope Haris dont get offended.The dna will show the mamak is indian origin.Thats the the problem in our community,always want to be crab,but they dont realise religion can be change but race cant.Anyway its happen when our mahathir send the team and sponsor by tax payer money.If its happen by your hard work and no longer malaysian citizen,the gomen and msn quickly will claim they make malaysia proud.Latest,the malaysian doctor donated her organ in france.MSN SAY,THE DOCTOR MAKE MALAYSIA PROUD.Hope she rest in piece.thanks.RAJ RAMAN.RELIGION;ANWSER TO GOD WHEN TIME DUE.U c someone swim in the english channel got datoship,what happen to this everest climber,one snatch by abdullah islam hadharihari.I have alot of customer with title dato,but some of them dont use the title,some scared my stuckup attitute will embrass them.ps.Very2 sorry if i offended you but i am same boat with you.Only i still on denial mood,want to be indian.
March 30, 2008 at 10:24 pm
Birdseye,
Remembered a bit of the chorus tune so here it is, hehe:
He touched you,
He touched you,
He touched you,
It was The Touch all right
March 31, 2008 at 1:40 am
Helen:
1. Sorry for jumping the gun on the gun-to-the-head
2. “But there’s also the implicit understanding that you don’t badmouth what’s relevant to your rice bowl, and outside of domestic-political news, there is also project-writing, e.g. publicity material for KL Fashion Week and all the other media-community-entertainment events organized by MSM. Positive or negative write-up, you tell me.”
Sorry. Very hard to agree. I think there are many times the MSM critics fail to see good, well researched and critical pieces in MSM – NST and Sun particularly.
March 31, 2008 at 7:07 am
Dear Raj Raman,
Be assured, I am not offended at all. I can understand where your ALL CAPITALS are coming from. You see, I often help my wife with her school administrative work (which teachers have to do far too much of nowadays). The ridiculous use of all capitals seems to have become embedded into the gormen mentality.
It is good that you are taking the trouble to participate actively, thereby improving your English. Can I make one more suggestion?Allow a space after a full stop or other punctuation mark.If you don’t it becomes harder to read.Compare this paragraph with the one above and you will see what I mean.
The other thing you (and some others) can learn to do is to break up your message into paragraphs. Each time you start on a new subject or sub-topic or idea, hit the Enter button first.
Like this. See how much easier it is to read? This way, you send your message more effectively.
Haris and others, I hope you guys are OK with my slipping in a lesson on Basic Writing Skills. I believe Raj Raman is keen to learn and will appreciate the tips.
Cheers.
March 31, 2008 at 7:16 am
Gua Bay Song,
You can be sure that every section of an MSM will be subjected to some level of political scrutiny. In the Malaysian context, political translates as BN-sensitive.
Education features will avoid critical pieces on what is wrong with our system.
Fashion/Art features will avoid coverage of talents currently out of favour with the powers-that-be.
And so on, ad nausueum.
“Smart” writers will do what is expected.
“Dumb” writers will get hit on the head.
“Angry” writers will quit and go elsewhere.
That is not going to change in a hurry. Not unless the owners are given good incentive to change.
March 31, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Well given on how the MSM would brag when someone from here gain fame internationally, i was rather surprise that no one is reporting that Shaun Maloney is from Penang, haha… perhaps it’s because of his Scottish background?
Here’s the excerpt from wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaun_Maloney
BTW, for those non-soccer-fans, Shaun Maloney is the current player of Aston Villa FC in English Premiere League
March 31, 2008 at 6:46 pm
I think this is getting out of hand. This is akin to “Conspiracy theories”.
I suggest Haris that please check before loading up such articles. They serve no purpose and in fact are the ‘other side ‘ of MSM ie. paranoid MSM bashing.
Lets be fair ourselves.
March 31, 2008 at 6:55 pm
Gua Bay Song,
To answer a question you posed me earlier: “I’m sure you have friends who work in the MSM. Are they all bad people? Do they deserve to be victim of Haris’ personal vendetta, regardless of whether he would be successful or not?”
Yup, I have good friends still in MSM. During election week, they let me use the computer in their homes (I live in Penang but based myself in KL for the campaign period) to blog People’s Parliament. Another MSM guy lent me his laptop which I plugged on wifi in Coffee Bean. Unlike with funded websites, pro bono volunteers have to simply make do on our own meagre resources, or lack thereof.
Haris does not have a personal vendetta, as in your charge: “You are all a bunch of hypocrites out for the blood of innocent journalists, sub-editors, managers, marketing team fellas, techies, production team, printers, vendors etc… who cannot control the editorial policies which you loath.”
I heartily agree that one or two people here may come across as hypocrites (and Birdseye has called upon those one or two to apologise to you) but you certainly hit home in pointing out that a lot of MSM-ers “cannot control the editorial policies which [we at PP] loathe”.
My friends are betting that Gua Bay Song works in the newspaper industry. So as insiders, you and I both can see a clearer picture. Just that we’ve chosen to be on opposing sides in this tussle.
What Hartal MSM desires is a pledge (re our online petition) to uphold honest journalism and what we have managed to do is put Boycott on the international map. This effort has been mentioned in a Brunei Times editorial, an IPS feature, reported in Singapore and Thailand, and we’ve also found mentions of our campaign in German and French-language websites, as well as Canadian too.
While newspapers like theSun have pretended that Hartal does not exist, we’ve pulled off putting a question mark against MSM’s credibility and also encouraged parallel efforts by other folks, such as the Flash Mobs and one tomorrow to make April Fool’s Day a Boycott MSM Day. So you see, we threw the curve ball and other groups in civil society are now running with it.
You argue: “Sorry. Very hard to agree. I think there are many times the MSM critics fail to see good, well researched and critical pieces in MSM – NST and Sun particularly.”
Ha, ha, like yours truly? I’ll tell you why for me theSun scrapes the bottom of the barrel. http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/?s=sun-stroke
I think you may be acquainted with former journo Chuah Siew Eng, now a Berita Malaysia moderator. She complains that NST editorials are “snooty” and “sneering” while another bM’sia regular calls them “smug”. Personally I’m flabbergasted at NST’s audacity in spinning but at least I’m willing to salute their writers for being masters of the propaganda game –they work hard for the money!
The Star, on the other hand, can be useful sometimes. I found out how many wives and children my old Uncle William really had when his Obituary was published.
Earlier, I had described theSun as being singing telegrams to the BN tune. Commentator johnleemk urged that I do a fairer cost-benefit analysis, i.e. whether the paper’s [to borrow your words now] “good, well-researched and critical pieces” outweigh what I called its muzak or elevator music.
Well, to me, preaching ‘tolerance’ and ‘moderation’ is just only so much a mealy mouthful because as I’ve said times before in Malaysiakini, one side is always expected to do the tolerating, whereas the moderating is similarly a one-way street – you may be aware that I’m almost as infamous as Haris for blipping on the Islamist radar.
So that’s why between the 3 papers, Sun irks me most; because its pontificating tone rings with that ingrained institutional bias (and I’m rather an iconoclast by nature) which supports an unacceptable status quo, or if you will, status quo ante of pre-March 8.
In any case, I’m glad to have had this chance to chat with you Gua Bay Song because I really do plan to hibernate as I’d declared (you may remember in which thread, wink), once discussion on my ‘Sun-stroke and ‘Bond Girl’ posts peter off.
Taking the stand that I do has caused a strain in my personal relationships with ex-colleagues, and now that the GE (to which Boycott was geared for) is over, I’m just plain tired and neglected too many obligations already.
March 31, 2008 at 10:58 pm
hi,
I wasnt to purchase the film the touch with michelle yeoh and the sound track please can you help me
thanks
Joe
April 1, 2008 at 7:58 am
JosephDiMeco,
Forget The Touch. The film version of Andrew Llyod Webber’s Phantom of the Opers is even more entertaining.
But I still love Michelle Yeoh who married an old man. Sigh.
April 1, 2008 at 7:39 pm
Thanks,Mr.sv. Your point noted. However bad is my writing skill but my speaking skill in english not bad.Alot of my customer is teaching me how to speak english after i left gomen school.Now my customer base are people like you,haris and anillnetto.Very powerfull people and when i join them, i become one of them.A bit stuck up but i am good guy.Thanks to you.STILL DEAMING 2B MALAYSIAN PUTRA.Raj Raman.
June 24, 2008 at 10:13 pm
[...] darling who could do …Earlier, I had described theSun as being singing telegrams to the BN tune.http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/2008/03/29/bond-girl-michelle-yeoh-was-malaysia%E2%80%99s-media-d…Singing TelegramsIndicate the "Elvis singing Telegram" Package you want by selecting package [...]
January 4, 2009 at 11:39 pm
Dear SV Singam,
Itu M.Magendran and Moganadass memang kita (mahathir) punya orang lah,tapi itu mahathir sudah mudah lupa.Lupa asal usul.Apa boleh buat ?
kraznyoctbyar