Gumption, a minister, one judge and a great many mediamen

Posted on June 12, 2008

21


The word ‘gumption’ conjures for me an image of Popeye, pipe in mouth and chin stuck well out, goading Brutus to ‘go on you ***?#* sucker, give it the best you got!’.

We’ve heard quite a bit of this word and seen a little of it in action of late.

Minister Zaid talked about gumption at the Benar talk before the walk on 1st June.

“Do you take up issues that are not popular with the owners of the newspapers? Are you prepared to face the consequence of pursuing objective, factual issues? This has nothing to do with the laws. It’s about gumption. It is about commitment to professionalism. It is about your commitment to tell the people the truth. No distortion. No gloss. No spinning and things like that”, Zaid directed at the media people present that morning.

I felt that Zaid could have himself demonstrated that same gumption that he enjoined on the media folk by roundly condemning as oppressive the PPPA, ISA, OSA and Sedition Act. After all, he had, in his book released last year entitled ‘In good faith’, plainly said there that these laws must be repealed.

And last week, my friend, Veera, of the Star, in his column, ‘Along the Watch Tower’, wrote about Zaid’s speech and quite a bit about ‘gumption’ in ‘Caught in gumption traps’.

Veera’s response to some of what Zaid had said may well be reflective of the views of many of the media folk who were there that morning.

“The audience, I must say, was “underwhelmed” by the simplicity of the logic. Was that his best shot, we wondered?

Let’s make it equally simple for him. If even rich and powerful people at the highest levels of government dare not disagree with their leaders, can you honestly expect lowly-paid journalists to have the pluck to take on their big bosses or company owners? Duh.

In case the minister is not aware, many good journalists have fallen by the wayside or been left in the doldrums for going against the grain of “politically correct thinking” in their organisations. Their only consolation is they still have their integrity.

It was, however, Veera’s closing three paragraphs that most caught my attention, for two reasons.

“It would be no easy task to change deep-rooted notions on media control, despite this being an era where information is available at the click of a mouse. After all, the politicians and the ministers, too, have their own gumption traps to deal with.

The fight ahead looks like a tough one for all stakeholders – editors, National Union of Journalists (NUJ) members, bloggers and media-related civil society groups like the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ), Writers Alliance for Media Independence (Wami) and Benar, a cyber body championing free and fair media.

Perhaps the first step to take is to forge a sense of solidarity. There is no indignity in trying to get back our long-lost gumption through safety in numbers”.

First, the stakeholders in the matter of a free media.

Veera made no mention of you and I, the readers, the consumers. No mention was made of the rakyat who pay RM1.20 for their daily copy of the Star for their daily dosage of ‘news’.

Are we not the most important of all stakeholders?

And then Veera spoke of the first step towards that free media as he saw it.

Solidarity. Safety in numbers.

Which brings me to that little bit of gumption in action that we’ve seen just this week.

I refer to Justice Ian HC Chin’s revelation a few days ago about Dr M’s unholy attempts to interfere with the judiciary about 10 years ago.

To this, Rocky asked and remarked :

“What took the Judge so long?…A really long time to live in fear, Yang Arif.”

Bro Rocky, no fair! As we ask ‘why so long?’, bear in mind that the same question might be asked of you, I and many, if not all of us.

Justice Ian Chin spoke of events in 1997. In 1996, he would have witnessed first-hand how a nation stood by and did nothing as another brave judge, Justice Syed Ahmad Idid, was forced to resign whilst the list of judicial improprieties he had sought to expose were ‘NFA’ed as being baseless and unfounded.

What moral foundation do we now have to ask this man with gumption, ‘Why so long?’.

Malik Imtiaz, both in his blog and in his weekly column in Malay Mail, having referred first to the woeful state of the nation, then writes :

“We are not without blame. We were stakeholders in the Government we voted in, it is what we allowed it to become. We let ourselves be seduced by its pied-piper tune of race and religion, privilege, supremacy and power sharing, stability and prosperity. We clapped our hands gleefully as it stroked our collective ego, some would say lobotomized us, with Malaysia Boleh.

…We cheered as we were told that we were sending a Malaysian into space, even though it was costing us a great deal of money, directly and indirectly – there were submarines in the mix, after all – and even though we really did not need a man in space, particularly one who was interested in making teh tarik and playing congkak.

We cheered as the petro-ringgits were spent as if they were going out fashion on the trinkets for us, and the big ticket items for a small elite. We cheered as we were told, over and over again, that we were the finest at this and the greatest at that, even as standards across the board were declining rapidly. University ratings, corruption and rule of law indexes, we slid down all of them without discrimination. Did we care? Apparently not, like that Emperor with his new clothes we were more interested in the lies.

Yes, we are all collectively to blame for the state of our nation.

Yet, late as it may have been, a great many, each on their own and without any sense of being part of a collective, found that gumption in themselves to say ‘enough is enough’, ‘this is my country, I want it back’ and unwittingly became part of the tsunami that 8308 turned out to be.

Veera, you cannot wait for the safety of numbers before you bring about change.

You need a few good men and women who will put truth, honour and professional integrity first before anything else.

You need a few good men and women for whom ‘My prayer and my sacrifice, my life and death are for God’ and ‘though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, i shall fear no evil for you are with me’ go beyond just the lips.

It’s about Wong Chun Wai calling the owners of the Star and saying ‘Sorry, no more spin-doctoring. That’s not in my contract of employment and not in my profession’s code of ethics’.

It’s about Wong Chun Wai calling a meeting of all his reporting staff and announcing ‘Tomorrow and forever more, we report the news as it is’.

And if Wong Chun Wai does not have the gumption to do these things, it’s about Veera and every journalist in the Star telling Wong Chun Wai ‘Report it as I write it or I walk. I want my integrity back’.